There Will Be No Boogers in the NYT
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb33/eeb33b35c0efce2d2cf66f7d6a1848bbec935c50" alt=""
Speaking of defense - somehow, it was during yesterday's opening Colts defense roll call that I discovered there is a Colts member who willingly allows others to call him "Booger"...Booger McFarland, that is. He is a defensive tackle. I can't say as for certain, but I'm guessing that means his job is to hit people. Anyway, it appears the New York Times ain't down with the Booger love. In their picture showing his sack of Rex Grossman (I maintain that Grossman slipped of his own accord), he is named only as "Anthony McFarland". C'mon guys. You gotta give the Boogs some respect.
Although I rather meanly said last night that Rex Grossman was now my second-favorite quarterback (after he slipped & fell twice in a row), he actually did a decent job. I just think that, all things being more or less equal, a lot of it came down to QB experience. Manning has it in spades. Grossman doesn't.
And, push come to shove, although everybody was sloppy as shit out there, the Colts were just a little less sloppy.
But let the good sportsmanship not detract from this simple fact: COLTS WON THE SUPERBOWL!!!!!!! Hell yeah.
Also, if you ever wondered, as I did lo! just last night, whatever happens to the loser's "Superbowl Champions" t-shirts, well, here ya go.
And finally, one of my own personal favorite-things-about-football, amply illustrated - the post-game man-love:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c157c/c157cfcaf51b3238b9ff6b65512ca3d29ff56f97" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c254/0c25462a3dcd494aaa119badf7d307756c99979d" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment